[Traditional Chinese] [Simplified Chinese] [Sitemap] [Contact Us] [FAQs] [Related Link] [Graphical]
About Us
Welcome Message
Our Aim
Our Services
Our Council
Our Staff
Duty Lawyer Scheme
Magistrates Courts
Juvenile Courts
Coroners Courts
One-way viewer identification parade at police stations
Hawkers appeal
Extradition proceedings
Labour Tribunal
Small Claims Tribunal Competition Tribunal
Free Legal Advice Scheme
Legal Advice Centres

Annual Report 2023
Overview
Administration
Duty Lawyer Scheme
Legal Assistance Scheme for Non-refoulement Claimants
Free Legal Advice Scheme
Tel-Law Scheme
Staff
Finance
Conclusion
Appendices
Tel-Law Scheme
Family law
Land law, landlord and terant
Criminal law
Employment law
Commercial, banking and sales of goods
Administrative and Constitutional law
Environmental law and tort
General legal information
National Security Law

Legal Assistance Scheme for Non-refoulement Claimants

Others
DLS’ Official Response to Media Reporting
Application procedures for inclusion in the Master Freelance Interpreters’ Lists




Tel-Law Scheme > Family law

The following can only be a brief introduction of the legal subject concerned. Before you take any action which may have legal consequence, you should first seek advice from your own lawyer or make an appointment at any District Office to see a volunteer lawyer of the Free Legal Advice Scheme.





(105) MAINTENANCE ON DIVORCE

Voice

Upon divorce the parties may agree on the maintenance to be given to the other party and the children. However, this cannot prevent either of them applying to the Court for an order to vary such agreement, although the court will be reluctant to do so if the agreement was freely arrived at and both parties have had legal advice.

A court order for maintenance after divorce can take several forms:-

Unsecured periodical payments. This orders the husband to pay from his likely future income. This is because, while the law treats men and women on a basis of equality, in practical terms, the husband is more likely to be able to pay. If the payer falls into arrears, the other party must ask the court to enforce payment of the arrears. The other party could also ask the court to attach the earnings / income of the payer provided that the other party honestly belief that there is no reasonable excuse for the default.

Secured periodical payments. This are more satisfactory. Usually, this is done by transferring certain assets of the payer to a trust. If the payer fails to keep up payments, the trustees can use the income or if necessary the capital of the trust to make up the payments.

Thirdly a lump sum, this could represent capitalized periodical payments and is more appropriate in Hong Kong. It is also advantageous to the payee in that it is not affected by a re-marriage and it gives a clean break to the parties.

Secured periodical payments will usually continue after the death of the payer. All periodical payments automatically cease on the re-marriage or death of the receiver. Moreover unsecured periodical payments cease on the death of the payer although the receiver may have a claim for reasonable provision from the payer's estate.

If the payer re-marries, there is no automatic determination of periodical payments but since the payer's financial circumstances are likely to be affected, he may apply to the court for variation of the original order, reducing or extinguishing the periodical payments.

For the court to decide on maintenance, each party must give full particulars of his or her income and capital. The court will take into account various factors in deciding how much the payee should receive. They are: resources, obligations, length of the marriage, age of the parties, and any disability, contributions to the welfare of the family, standard of living during marriage, and loss of any benefit. Only very bad conduct will disqualify someone from receiving periodical payments. Adultery alone is not sufficient but extreme violence probably would be.

If the need arises later, either party can apply for a variation of the order for periodical payments. In deciding whether a variation is justified, the court must take into account the same factors as when deciding the original order.

Date of amendment: 1st December 1998

Previous Page Back To Top